Global Approaches to Surgical Treatment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures
Thetis Medical®
May 25, 2025

Global Approaches to Surgical Treatment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures

A comprehensive analysis of international surgical trends for Achilles tendon rupture management, revealing significant variations in treatment preferences across countries.


Achilles Tendon Rupture Treatment by Country

Compare how different countries approach treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Countries are colored based on their current surgical rates.

🇫🇷

France

92%

Strong preference for surgical treatment

Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38615885/
🇩🇪

Germany

88.7%

Slight decline but still predominantly surgical

Source: bookinghealth.com/disease/achilles-tendon-rupture/germany
🇮🇹

Italy

80%
🇯🇵

Japan

72%

Increase in surgical treatment from 67% in 2010 to 72% in 2017

Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8543583/
🇺🇸

United States

70%

Surgical repair rate remained stable at around 70%

Source: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2325967114549948
🇰🇷

South Korea

61%

Slight decrease but remained predominantly surgical

Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34708136/
🇳🇿

New Zealand

39.4%

Selective approach to treatment with 39

Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21733434/
🇫🇮

Finland

15.2%

Significant decline beginning in 2008

Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36389616/
🇸🇪

Sweden

14.4%

Significant decline in surgical treatment

Source: bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/10/3/e001960
🇦🇺

Australia

12.3%

68% decrease in surgical repairs between 2009 and 2014, continuing to decline to 12

Source: research.monash.edu/en/publications/twelve-month-outcomes-following-surgical-repair-of-the-achilles-t
🇨🇦

Canada

9.2%

Significant decline after 2009

Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28053261/
🇬🇧

United Kingdom

5%

Strong trend toward non-operative management

Source: www.bmj.com/content/364/bmj.k5120
Conservative Treatment
Surgical Treatment

About This Data

Treatment approaches for Achilles tendon ruptures vary significantly across countries, influenced by healthcare systems, medical traditions, and evolving research. Countries like the UK favor conservative management with evidence showing equivalent outcomes, while the US shows a strong preference for surgical intervention, particularly among athletic populations.

92%

Recovery rate with proper conservative treatment according to Willits et al. (2010)

4.5%

Average re-rupture rate difference between surgical and non-surgical approaches (Ochen et al., JAMA 2019)

68%

Proportion of centers using early weight-bearing protocols in non-surgical management (Kearney et al., 2021)

Note: In the UK and Australia they are called "anaesthetists" rather than "anesthesiologists" as in the US. Medical terminology varies between countries based on different healthcare systems and traditions.